Here are some things you can do to influence how you appear as a researcher in the academic community and in society in general. With these factors, you can influence how your publications, data, and other research-related activities are discovered. You can adopt the methods that feel right for you.
1. Make sure that your information and researcher profile are up to date.
2. Make your publications and data discoverable
3. Publish open access
4. Talk about your publications and network
Do you want to monitor your social media presence? With PlumX and Altmetric Explorer, you can track the number of downloads, mentions on news sites, tweets, and "likes" your posts gain on social media. This tracking is called altmetrics.
In the public portal of the research information system TUNICRIS, you can monitor the accumulation of social media presence for each publication. Read more about this in the Researcher's impact section of the guide.
The term publication channel is usually used to refer to various printed and/or electronic publication series (e.g. journals, book series, and conference series) and book publishers. Typically, publication channels publish selected content aimed at a specific target group, such as experts in a field of science, professionals, or the general public. The publication types defined by the Ministry of Education and Culture are partly based on the division of publication channels by target group.
Scientific publishing is mainly focused on journals, which is why we will next examine the evaluation of journals and what this evaluation says about the visibility of journals. The methods used in evaluating journals indicate the average visibility of the journal. It should also be noted that indicators describing the quality of journals should not be used to draw conclusions about individual articles or researchers.
Journal evaluation methods can be divided into subjective methods (expert evaluation, qualitative evaluation systems such as the Publication Forum, whether peer review is used, the journal's reputation in the field, and whether the journal is indexed in citation databases) and quantitative evaluation methods (journal citation impact indicators such as Journal Impact Factor (JIF), journal usage statistics, and article acceptance or rejection rates).
Below are a few tools that can be used to evaluate journals from different perspectives.
Publication Forum (JUFO) is a Finnish system for assessing the quality of scientific publications, which operates in connection with the Federation of Finnish Learned Societies (TSV). In JUFO classification, the key foreign and domestic publication channels in all fields of science are divided into four levels:
1 = baseline
2 = leading
3 = top
0 = channels that do not (yet) meet Level 1 criteria
The level classification describes the impact and prestige of scientific publication channels in the scientific community. The classification is kept up-to-date, and evaluations are carried out by 23 discipline-specific expert panels. JUFO classification is intended only for evaluating large numbers of publications, and it is not suitable for assessing the merits of individual researchers, see Publication Forum user guide. JUFO classification treats humanities and social sciences more equally than citation analyses do.
JUFO classification is used as a quality indicator for scientific publications produced by universities in the university funding model set by the Ministry of Education and Culture. A total of 14 per cent of the basic funding for universities is allocated based on scientific and other publications (in 2021–2021).
Citation impact indicators are based on the idea that articles that receive a lot of citations are significant in their field of science, and thus also the journals in which the articles have appeared are of high quality. Indicators based on citations can only be calculated years after the publication of the journal, since citations accumulate based on articles that are published later.
Journal Citation Reports is a part of the Web of Science database that reports the impact factors of scientific journals. The impact factor number indicates how many times each article in the journal has been cited on average, the citation data is taken from last two years.
The IF number also attracts a lot of criticism because it does not take into account the different citation practices of different disciplines. Its formation is also influenced by the number of issues in the journal and the type of the journal. Citation rates are often higher in journals that have a wider scope and publish review articles, than in specialised, low-publication journals. The IF number also does not assess citations, all citations are worth the same in it. Many journals don't have an impact factor number, but that doesn't mean that they're bad journals. They may be new, and their research turnover is slow.
N.B! A researcher does not have an impact factor, a journal does. It is therefore not suitable for assessing the merits of an individual researcher.
Impact Factor (JIF) -formula:
Cabells service supports the evaluation of scientific journals and provides tools for choosing a publication channel. In addition, the service helps identify predatory journals.
We have access to sections:
The user can use Journalytics to search for journals and filter them by discipline or topic, publisher, ISSN (International Standard Serial Number), open access status, and various indicators related to the publication process and peer review.
Predatory Reports is a database of fraudulent and predatory journals. It can be used to evaluate scientific journals for example when choosing a publication channel. The assessment made by experts is founded on a three-tiered set of criteria based on the seriousness of the violation. The assessment examines, among other things, integrity, peer review process, publication practices, metrics, and fees. Extreme examples of violations:
a) The same article appears in more than one journal.
b) The editors do not actually exist, or they are deceased.
c) No articles have been published or issues and/or articles are missing from the archives.
d) The journal uses misleading metrics (e.g. "impact factor" when not referring to JIF).
e) The journal does not state that the publication, review, submission, etc. involve fees, but the author is charged a fee after submitting a manuscript.
Links to services: