Skip to Main Content

Guide for new students: Scholarly or not?

Evaluating sources

Pages of an old book.

Image: Jonne Renvall / Tampere University

Evaluating information sources can be tricky, especially when it comes to online sources. Here are some things to consider when you are looking for information online:

Author:

  • Is the material produced by a known agency, organisation or expert?
  • Does the creator have authority in the field or topic in question?
  • Is the author known? For example, the articles in Wikipedia do not have a named author, and they are not suitable sources for academic study.

Validity

  • Is the information thoroughly researched, objective and reliable?
  • Have the sources been marked correctly? Is there a bibliography?
  • Has it been peer-reviewed by an expert in the field?

Content

  • Is the text content objective or subjective?
  • Is the information factual or does it represent the author's personal opinion?
  • Is the information unique, or can similar or more accurate information be found elsewhere?

Target audience

  • Who is the information intended for?
  • Does the information match your information need?

Source: Guide to information retrieval [WWW]. Espoo, Aalto University Library. [cited 14.7.2014]. Available: http://libguides.aalto.fi/informationretrieval

How to recognize a scholarly journal?

Periodical is a term used to describe any publication that is published multiple times (periodically). Periodicals include materials such as popular magazines, scholarly journals, and newspapers.

It is important to understand the difference between a popular and a scholarly periodical. When you are doing research, most of your sources should be scholarly.

Often popular periodicals are called magazines and scholarly periodicals are called journals. Many times it will be acceptable to use some popular material, but research papers should not be based solely on popular literature.

Explore this visual aid describing the key elements of an academic journal article: Anatomy of a Scholarly Article

 

Criteria

Popular Magazine

Trade Journal

Scholarly Journal / Academic Journal

Example

Helsingin Sanomat, La Gazette, New York Times, Suomen Kuvalehti.

Chemical Week, InfoWorld Daily News, Markkinointi & Mainonta, Metallitekniikka

Harvard Business Review, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, The Lancet

Content

Secondary discussion of someone else's research; may include personal narrative or opinion; general information, purpose is to entertain or inform.

Current news, trends and products in a specific industry; practical information for professionals working in the field or industry.

In-depth, primary account of original findings written by the researcher(s); very specific information, with the goal of scholarly communication.

Author

Author is frequently a journalist paid to write articles, may or may not have subject expertise.

Author is usually a professional in the field, sometimes a journalist with subject expertise.

Author's credentials are provided; usually a scholar or specialist with subject expertise. Author is not paid a fee for writing the article.

Audience

General public; the interested non-specialist.

Professionals in the field; the interested non-specialist.

Scholars, researchers, and students.

Language

Vocabulary in general usage; easily understandable to most readers.

Specialized terminology or jargon of the field, but not as technical as a scholarly journal.

Specialized terminology or jargon of the field; requires expertise in subject area.

Graphics

Graphs, charts and tables; lots of glossy advertisements and photographs.

Photographs; some graphics and charts; advertisements targeted to professionals in the field.

Graphs, charts, and tables; very few advertisements and photographs.

Layout & Organization

Informal; may include non-standard formatting. May not present supporting evidence or a conclusion

Informal; articles organized like a journal or a newsletter. Evidence drawn from personal experience or common knowledge.

Formal; includes the article abstract, goals and objectives, methodology, results (evidence), discussion, conclusion, and bibliography.

Reliability

Articles are evaluated by editorial staff, not experts in the field; edited for format and style.

Articles are evaluated by editorial staff who may be experts in the field, not peer-reviewed*; edited for format and style.

Articles are evaluated by peer-reviewers* or referees who are experts in the field; edited for content, format, and style.

References

Rare. Little, if any, information about source materials is given,

Occasional brief bibliographies, but not required

Required. Quotes and facts are verifiable.

Source: "Scholarly vs. Popular Materials" by Amy VanScoy, NCSU Library and "Scholarly, Popular and Trade Journals" by Jason Puckett & Lyn Thaxton at GSU.

*Peer-review: the article (data, method, conclusions, references,etc.) is evaluated by one or more specialist in the field before it is accepted for publication.

Logo

Email: library@tuni.fi
P. 0294 520 900

Kirjaston kotisivut | Library homepage
Andor

Palaute | Feedback